Monthly Archives: May 2010

Binding Object Properties – Source

One of the splendid aspects of the WPF data binding engine is that it can bind to nearly any data source including XML data, ADO.NET classes, LINQ queries, WPF elements, and types that implement IEnumerable or IList. Source – references a Binding‘s data source. By default this object references the element’s DataContext value, which might be inherited from an ancestor element’s DataContext, as discussed in the DataContext section. If you set this property to a non-null value, then the data binding operation will treat that value as the place where data is pushed to and pulled from. A binding configured with the Source property takes precedence over any applied data context.

Ex of Source Objects:

  • You can bind to any CLR objects, including list objects. You can bind to the entire object or public properties, sub-properties, and indexers of the object. Fields are not supported. The binding engine uses CLR reflection to get the values of the properties. Alternatively, objects that implement ICustomTypeDescriptor or have a registered TypeDescriptionProvider also work with the binding engine.
  • You can bind to ADO.NET objects such as DataTable.
  • You can bind to an XmlNode, XmlDocument, or XmlElement, and run XPath queries on them.

As has been discussed earlier, every binding must have a binding target and target property. The binding isn’t complete unless you also specify the data source and source property.

Sometimes you want to show a single value from a data source. It might be showing a font name in a label or an invoice date in a calendar control. Perhaps you’d like to bind the value of one control to the input of another.  Here is an example showing how to bind the Value property of a Slider control to the FontSize property of a TextBlock:

<Slider x:Name='mSlider' Orientation='Horizontal' Minimum='10' Maximum='80' Value='25' />
        <TextBlock Text='Hello World' Margin='5,0' FontSize= '{Binding ElementName=mSlider, Path= Value}'/>
        
        

A binding source is usually a property on an object so you need to provide both the data source object and the data source property in your binding XAML. In the above example the ElementName attribute signifies that you want data from another element on the page and the Path signifies the appropriate property. A binding path can be a complex value, drilling into the member hierarchy, but in this case it’s just the name of the property.

What Can Be a Data Source?: You can use any type as a data source as long as it has a public parameter less constructor and at least one public property. Here’s a sample of binding to System.String. In the example below, we are creating a local resource in the XAML and using that as a Data Source in the binding to bind the TextBox to the local employee object we created in XAML. Coming to TextBlock, we are just saying Text=”{Binding}”, which is setting the textBlock binding in the XAML file and the data context in the code behind: So this TextBlock binds to the EmployeeName string property of the Employee class object we created in the code behind.

  1. <Window x:Class="Bindingtoclasses.MainWindow"
  2.         xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation&quot;
  3.         xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml&quot;
  4.         xmlns:src="clr-namespace:Bindingtoclasses"
  5.         Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
  6.     <Grid >
  7.         <Grid.Resources>
  8.                 <src:Employee x:Key="myDataSource" EmployeeName="Kishore1021"/>
  9.         </Grid.Resources>
  10.         <Grid.RowDefinitions>
  11.             <RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
  12.             <RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
  13.             <RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
  14.             <RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
  15.         </Grid.RowDefinitions>
  16.         <TextBox Grid.Row="0" Text="{Binding Source= {StaticResource myDataSource}, Path=EmployeeName}"></TextBox>
  17.         <TextBlock Grid.Row="1" Text="{Binding}"></TextBlock>
  18.             
  19.         </Grid>
  20. </Window>

 

In the C# code-behind file:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Windows.Data;
using System.Windows.Documents;
using System.Windows.Input;
using System.Windows.Media;
using System.Windows.Media.Imaging;
using System.Windows.Navigation;
using System.Windows.Shapes;
using System.ComponentModel;

namespace Bindingtoclasses
{
    public partial class MainWindow : Window
    {
        public MainWindow()
        {
            InitializeComponent();
            Employee P = new Employee("Hello World");
            this.DataContext = P.EmployeeName;
        }
    }

    public class Employee
    {
        private string name;

        public Employee()
        {
        }

        public Employee(string value)
        {
            this.name = value;
        }

        public string EmployeeName
        {
            get { return name; }
            set
            {
                name = value;
            }
        }

    }

}

 

Source code can be downloaded from here.

There are many ways to specify your binding source, that is, to specify where your data is coming from. The simplest way is to instantiate the source object as a resource in XAML and then the Source property of the Binding to that resource

Using the Source property is simpler and more readable. However, if multiple properties bind to the same source, consider using the DataContext property. The DataContext property provides a convenient way to establish a data scope. Say you have many controls and you want all of them to bind to the same source.

<Window x:Class="Bindingtoclasses.MainWindow"
        xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation&quot;
        xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml&quot;
        xmlns:src="clr-namespace:Bindingtoclasses"

        Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
    <Grid DataContext="{Binding Path=.}">
        <Grid.Resources>
                <src:Employee x:Key="myDataSource" EmployeeName="Kishore1021"/>
        </Grid.Resources>
        <Grid.RowDefinitions>
            <RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
            <RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
            <RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
            <RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
            <RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
            <RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
        </Grid.RowDefinitions>
        <TextBox Name="TextBox1" Grid.Row="0" Text="{Binding Source={StaticResource myDataSource}, Path=EmployeeName, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"/>
        <TextBox Name="TextBox2" Grid.Row="1" Text="{Binding Source= {StaticResource myDataSource}, Path=EmployeeName}"></TextBox>
        <TextBox Name="TextBox3" Grid.Row="2" Text="{Binding Path=EmployeeNameTest.EmployeeName, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"></TextBox>
        <TextBox Name="TextBox4" Grid.Row="3" Text="{Binding Path=EmployeeNameTest.EmployeeName}"></TextBox>
        <TextBlock Name="TextBlock1" Grid.Row="4" Text="{Binding Path=EmployeeNameTest.EmployeeName}"/>
        <TextBlock Name="TextBlock2" Grid.Row="5" Text="{Binding Path=AnotherField}"/>
        
    </Grid>
</Window>

In this case, you set the DataContext property of your Grid to that source so that all elements in that Grid inherit that common source. <Grid DataContext="{Binding Path=.}"> implies that whatever is the DataContext coming in from the code (In the code it is, this.DataContext = c)will be assigned to the grid. The TextBox3,4 and TextBlock1 in this example both inherit the binding source from the Grid . When you run this, you see TextBox3,4 and TextBlock1 with value “Hello World”.

Download the Source code from Microsoft here.

Priority of Source VS DataContext:
Code Snippet
<Window x:Class="DataBinding_Source_Property.MainWindow"
        xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation&quot;
        xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml&quot;
        Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525"
        xmlns:kishore="clr-namespace:DataBinding_Source_Property">
   <Window.Resources>
       <kishore:Person x:Key="PersonXAMLDataSource" FullName="Kishore1021"/>
        <kishore:Person x:Key="Person1" FullName="Person1Name"/>
    </Window.Resources>
    
    <Grid DataContext="{StaticResource Person1}">
        <Grid.RowDefinitions>
            <RowDefinition Height="*"> </RowDefinition>
            <RowDefinition Height="*"></RowDefinition>
        </Grid.RowDefinitions>
        
        <TextBox Grid.Row="0" Text="{Binding Source={StaticResource PersonXAMLDataSource}, Path=FullName}"></TextBox>
        <TextBox Grid.Row="1" Text="{Binding Path=FullName}"/>
    </Grid>
</Window>

 

The first TextBox inherits the DataContext from the parent Grid and has a Source set in the Binding object too. In this case, the binding Source takes priority, causing the TextBox to bind to the Name property of the resource with key “PersonXAMLDataSource” – this displays “kishore1021”. The second inherits the DataContext from the parent Grid causing the TextBox to bind to the Name property of the resource with key “Person1”, causing it to display “Person1Name”.

Most data bound applications tend to use DataContext much more heavily than Source. Use DataContext only when you need to bind more than one property to a particular source. When binding only one property to a source, always use Source. The reason for this is ease of debugging – We can see all the information about the Binding in one place than search for the nearest DataContext to understand what is going on. In a small sample like the one above there is no big advantage, but in complex applications this could save you some time.

Download the source code from Microsoft here

"Management is efficiency in climbing the ladder of success; leadership determines whether the ladder is leaning against the right wall."— Stephen R. Covey